Legal Opinion

Reddick v. Capouano, Beckman, Russell & Burnett, LLC (CONSENT)

District Court, M.D. Alabama

Decided March 18, 2021No. 2:19-cv-00512Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION KEITH REDDICK, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) CASE NO. 2:19-cv-512-JTA ) (WO) CAPOUANO, BECKMAN, RUSSELL ) & BURNETT, LLC, a Limited Liability ) Company, ) ) Defendant. ) MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Keith Reddick (“Plaintiff”) filed this action against Capouano, Beckman, Russell & Burnett, LLC (“Defendant”) alleging violations of the Federal Debt Collection Practices Act and several state tort claims. Before the Court is Defendant’s motion for summary judgment. (Docs. No. 20, 21.) The…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Larry Bonner v. City of Prichard, AlabamaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1981
  5. Mann v. Taser International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2009

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API