Honerine Min. & Mill. Co. v. Tallerday Steel Pipe & Tank Co.
Utah Supreme Court
Appeal from District Court, Salt Lake County; M. L. Ritchie, Judge. Action by the Honerine Mining & Milling Company and another against the Tallerday Steel Pipe & Tank Company and another.- Erom a judgment quashing the summons for failure of service, plaintiffs appeal. appellant's points.
Read the full summary
Appeal from District Court, Salt Lake County; M. L. Ritchie, Judge. Action by the Honerine Mining & Milling Company and another against the Tallerday Steel Pipe & Tank Company and another.- Erom a judgment quashing the summons for failure of service, plaintiffs appeal. appellant's points. The judgment dismissing the action terminated the mat-, ter; and the judgment was, therefore, a final judgment, and, as such, appealable. {Re Auerbach Est., 23 Utah 529; Watson v. Mayberry, 15 Utah 265.) The words “management, direction or control,” are, when considered in this connection, very broad terms;…
1Opinion of the CourtFkick, J.
The only question involved in this case is one of personal jurisdiction. The appellants filed their complaint against the respondents in the district court of Salt Lake county, and the principal respondent, who will be designated as “Tal-lerday Company,” being a corporation of the state of Iowa, and not engaged in doing business in Utah, was sought to be served with process by serving summons on one T. K. Elliott, who it is claimed, was an agent of said corporation upon whom service of process could be made, under the statute of this state. After the return of summons showing service upon…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- St. Clair v. CoxSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- United States v. American Bell Telephone Co.United States Circuit Court · 1886
- Good Hope Co. v. Railway Barb Fencing Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1884
- Abbeville Electric Light & Power Co. v. Western Electrical Supply Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1901
- Mikolas v. Hiram Walker & SonsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1898
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Boston Acme Mines Development Co. v. ClawsonUtah Supreme Court · 1925