Legal Opinion
Spyker v. Hart
Supreme Court of Louisiana
Decided July 15, 1870No. 151PublishedCited by 4 opinions
APPEAL from the District Court, parish of Caddo. J. G. Moneure, (attorney at law), Special Judge, vice Levisee, J., recused.
1Opinion of the CourtHowe, J.
This action was instituted upon the following obligation :
“Received, Shreveport, Louisiana, February 24, 1864, of Robert C. Cummings, fourteen thousand dollars, in full payment of one hundred bales of cotton, weighing four hundred and fifty pounds, each. R. C. Cummings takes fire and war risks and furnishes bagging and rope to bale same. E. C. Hart is to gin and bale said cotton and all other risks, except as stated above.
(Signed) E. C. HART.
Indorsed: R. C. Cummings.
The plaintiff as transferree of Cummings, claimed one hundred bales of cotton or their value. The defendant answered that the…
2Cited by4 opinions
- State v. BozemanSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1924
- Jordan v. Checker Cab Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1928
- Hartman-Salmen Co. v. MaloneyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1934
- Thompson v. Bland Produce Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1962