Underwriters at Lloyds v. Smith
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Taylor, 0.
This is an appeal from an order of the municipal court of the city of Minneapolis! sustaining a demurrer to the complaint on the ground that the facts stated do not constitute a cause of action. ■
It appears from the complaint that plaintiff had insured E. O.l Dahlquist against liability for injuries resulting from; the operation' of a truck owned by him; that a collision occurred between this truck and defendant’s automobile in which one Stewart, a passenger in defendant’s automobile, was injured; that Stewart recovered a judgment of $1,295.70 against Dahlquist for such injuries…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Union Stock Yards Co. v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Ellis v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1918
- Hobbs v. HurleySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1918
- Mayberry v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1907
- Ankeny v. MoffettSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1887
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Northwest Airlines, Inc. v. Transport Workers UnionSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- George's Radio, Inc. v. Capital Transit Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1942
- García Molina v. Gobierno de la Capital y the Puerto Rican & American InsuranceSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1951
- Lincenberg v. IssenSupreme Court of Florida · 1975
- Quatray v. WickerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1933
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.