Legal Opinion
M.G. v. Young
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided June 21, 2016No. 15-2090PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
McKAY, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiffs filed a complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 in which they raised various claims relating to their arrests and now-vacated convictions for prostitution. The district court, with a magistrate judge presiding by consent of the parties, dismissed most of Plaintiffs’ claims as barred by the statute of limitations and granted Defendants’ motion for summary judgment on Plaintiffs’ surviving claims of malicious prosecution. Plaintiffs appeal only the grant of summary judgment on their malicious prosecution claims against one Defendant, Mr. David Young.
Mr. Young was…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Giglio v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Kossler v. CrisantiCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009
- Wilkins v. DeReyesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
- Twigg v. Hawker Beechcraft Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
- Truck Insurance Exchange v. Magnetek, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2004
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Montoya v. VigilCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2018
- Ra-King Allen v. New Jersey State PoliceCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2020
- Fenn v. City of Truth or ConsequencesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2020
- Estate of David Papadakos v. NortonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2016
- Brandt v. City of WestminsterDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2018
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.