Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Line v. Rouse

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided October 23, 1992No. S-91-585PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBoslaugh, J.

This case arose out of a controversy between the relator, William G. Line, an attorney at law, and Merrill Snover and Dorothy Willnerd, two beneficiaries of the estate of Walter Snover, deceased. The respondent is Gerald E. Rouse, a county judge.

Line was formerly the personal representative appointed in the Snover estate proceedings, but in In re Estate of Snover, 233 Neb. 198, 443 N.W.2d 894 (1989), the order of the district court removing Line as personal representative was affirmed.

Merrill Snover and Willnerd were appointed as copersonal representatives to succeed Line, and they then filed…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Freezer Services, Inc. v. MullenNebraska Supreme Court · 1990
  2. In Re Estate of SnoverNebraska Supreme Court · 1989
  3. State Ex Rel. Mercurio v. Board of RegentsNebraska Supreme Court · 1983
  4. State Ex Rel. Pederson v. HowellNebraska Supreme Court · 1991
  5. State Ex Rel. People for Responsible Omaha Urban Development v. ConleyNebraska Supreme Court · 1990

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of SnoverNebraska Court of Appeals · 1996
  2. Beller v. CrowNebraska Supreme Court · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API