True v. Bullard
Nebraska Supreme Court
Error from tlie district court of Hitchcock county. Tried below before Welty, J. cited: Taylor v. Coon, 48 N. W. Rep. [Wis.], 123; Qi'egory v. Hartley, 6 Neb., 356; Holmes v. First Nat.
Read the full summary
Error from tlie district court of Hitchcock county. Tried below before Welty, J. cited: Taylor v. Coon, 48 N. W. Rep. [Wis.], 123; Qi'egory v. Hartley, 6 Neb., 356; Holmes v. First Nat. Bank of Lincoln, 38 Neb., 326; Bradford v. Prescott, 85 Me., 483; Sturtevant v. Randall, 53 Me., 149; Smith v. Morrill, 54 Me., 48; Patten v. Pearson, 57 Me., 428; Jones v. Childs, 8 Nev., 124; Wright v. Whiting, 40 Barb. [N. Y.], 240; Bellom v. Freeborn, 63 N. Y., 388; Furnas v. Furgin, 119 Mass., 500; Hall v. Nash, 10 Mich., 304. cited: Pale v. Gear, 9 Am. Rep. [Conn.], 353; Charles v. Denis, 24 Am. Rep.…
1Opinion of the Court
Ragan, C.
The material facts in this case are: On the 9th of December, 1889, one R. W. Boston made his certain promissory note of that date for $265, due September 9, 1890. This note was payable to the order of and delivered to one S. L. True. Before the maturity of this note True sold and delivered it to W. C. Bullard & Co., and indorsed it in blank. Before the note matured Bullard & Co. sold it to a bank, and it not being paid at maturity, the bank sued the maker of the note and True as an indorser and obtained a judgment against them. True then brought this suit in *412the district court of…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Holmes v. First National BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1893
- Churchill v. MooreSupreme Court of Kansas · 1875
3Cited by4 opinions
- Sykes v. EverettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
- Sykes v. . EverettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
- Jaster v. CurrieNebraska Supreme Court · 1903
- Whitney v. SpearmanNebraska Supreme Court · 1897