Legal Opinion

Churchill v. Moore

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided July 15, 1875PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Error from Doniphan District Court. All the facts in this case are stated in the opinion of the court. Moore as plaintiff, had judgment at the March Term 1873, and Churchill brings the case here.

1Opinion of the Court

•The opinion of the court was delivered by

Valentine, J.:

The facts of this case are briefly as follows: Henry Churchill, who was the owner of a certain judgment rendered in a justice’s court in favor of himself and against Gordon & J ones, caused an execution to be issued thereon and placed in the hands of W. W. Moore, a constable, for service. Moore by virtue of said execution levied upon a horse believed to belong to Gordon, but in fact belonging to Mrs. Mauritzius. Mrs. Mauritzius immediately replevied said horse. Moore then gave a redelivery bond, retained the horse, and afterward sold him…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. True v. BullardNebraska Supreme Court · 1895

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API