Legal Opinion

Fishel v. City & County of Denver

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided November 12, 1940No. 14,679PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Knous

In the court below defendant in error, to which reference is herein made as the city, instituted this proceeding in eminent domain to condemn certain lands of plaintiff in error, whom we shall designate as Fishel, situate in Arapahoe county. On the trial the jury returned a verdict describing the property taken and fixing the value of the land and improvements at $7,000. Judgment was entered on the verdict, to review which Fishel prosecutes a writ of error. So far as generally pertinent to this review the petition alleges that August 26, 1937, there became effective an act of Congress…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Kohl v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  2. Gilmer v. ThrockmortonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1861
  3. Wassenich v. City & County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1919
  4. City & County of Denver v. HallettSupreme Court of Colorado · 1905
  5. Lancey v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1896

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Service Oil Co. v. RhodusSupreme Court of Colorado · 1972
  2. City of Thornton v. Farmers Reservoir & Irrigation Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1978
  3. Delfeld v. City of TulsaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942
  4. City of Denver v. Board of CommissionersSupreme Court of Colorado · 1945
  5. Town of Glendale v. City and County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1958

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API