Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

State ex rel. Wyoming Workers' Compensation Division v. Halstead

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided July 17, 1990No. 89-130Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in part

ROONEY, Justice,

Retired, specially concurring in part and dissenting in part.

I concur with the procedural holding of the majority opinion, i.e., that which holds that the hearing examiner lacked the power to give a summary judgment. See Jackson v. State ex rel. Wyoming Workers’ Compensation Division, 786 P.2d 874 (Wyo.1990). I find additional procedural error. I dissent from that held in the rest of the majority opinion — the substantive holding.

PROCEDURE

The improper entry of a summary judgment by the hearing examiner is an indication of her misunderstanding of her role in this proceeding.…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Hopkinson v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1983
  2. State Ex Rel. Motor Vehicle Division v. HoltzWyoming Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Barber v. State Highway CommissionWyoming Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Wyoming State Department of Education v. BarberWyoming Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Story v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1988

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API