Legal Opinion

Metropolitan Aluminum Manufacturing Co. v. Lau

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided November 15, 1908PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal by the plaintiff from a judgment rendered in favor of the defendant in the Municipal Court of the city of Eew York, first district, borough of Manhattan.

1Opinion of the CourtGildersleeve, J.

This action, is brought to recover damages for breach of contract, arising out of defendant’s cancellation of an ordor for calendars placed by him with plaintiff. The evidence shows that on the 17th day of February, 1908, plaintiff’s salesman, one Campstein, procured of the defendant a written order for calendars, for which defendant agreed to pay on delivery. The said order was forwarded to plaintiff by its salesman, and, on the 20th day of February, 190-8, plaintiff notified defendant of its acceptance of said order. The order, signed by this defendant, contained, among others, the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Reynolds v. . RobinsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
  2. Messelback v. . NormanNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
  3. Beck v. DonohueAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1899
  4. Legnard v. Standard Life & Accident InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903
  5. Allen v. St. Lawrence County Farmers' InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1895

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Chaney v. Dreyfus Service Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2010
  2. Held v. Puget Sound & Alaska Powder Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API