Held v. Puget Sound & Alaska Powder Co.
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtKelly, J.
For several years beginning sometime about 1924, plaintiff has operated a rock quarry near the city of Rainier in Columbia county, Oregon. It was plaintiff’s practice to have rock blasted from this quarry. Among those engaged in this business, a single operation consisting of the preparation of the necessary tunnels, placing explosives therein, wiring the same for the purposes of ignition, closing the tunnels by back filling and causing an explosion is termed a “shot.”
Defendant is a corporation organized under the laws of the state of Washington with a branch office in Portland, Oregon.
Plainti…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Connell v. McLoughlinOregon Supreme Court · 1895
- Baker v. SeaweardOregon Supreme Court · 1912
- Sherman, Clay & Co. v. Buffum & PendletonOregon Supreme Court · 1919
- Thomas v. Smith-Wagoner Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1925
- Bridenstine v. Gerlinger Motor Car Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1917
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Briggs v. MorganOregon Supreme Court · 1972
- Willamette Tug & Barge Co. v. Commercial Dispatching Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1947
- Geldermann and Company, Inc. v. Dept. of Rev.Oregon Tax Court · 1985