Legal Opinion
Carty v. Health-Chem Corp.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided June 15, 1982No. Civ. A. 82-1287, 82-1289PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
VanARTSDALEN, District Judge.
Defendants in civil actions 82-1287 (the Carty action) and 82-1289 (the Peil action) have moved to transfer both actions to the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a). They challenge venue in this court on the bases that (1) venue is improper in this district in that any act constituting an alleged violation did not occur in this district, (2) all of the prospective witnesses and relevant documentary evidence are in New York, and (3) plaintiffs’ choice of forum is of little…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Koster v. (American) Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Zorn v. AndersonDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1966
- Owatonna Manufacturing Company v. Melroe CompanyDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1969
- Sohns v. DahlDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 1975
- Blender v. SibleyDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1975
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Securities Investor Protection Corp. v. VigmanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- Houk v. Kimberly-Clark Corp.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1985
- Job Haines Home for the Aged v. YoungDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1996
- CIBC World Markets, Inc. v. Deutsche Bank Securities, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2004
- GRM v. Equine Investment & Management GroupDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1984
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.