Legal Opinion

Brunner v. Horton

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided May 2, 1985No. 83CA0572PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KELLY, Judge.

Defendant, Jack Horton, appeals the jury verdict entered in favor of the plaintiff, Rhinie Bruner, in this breach of fiduciary duty action, arguing that there was insufficient evidence to support the verdict and that the trial court erred in instructing the jury. We affirm.

Plaintiff, an onion farmer, engaged defendant, a produce broker, to market his 1980 crop. On a commission basis, defendant assumed the job of arranging transportation, selecting buyers, setting prices, collecting the net proceeds of the sales and paying plaintiff. Defendant shipped four loads of onions to the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. City of Aurora v. LovelessSupreme Court of Colorado · 1981
  2. FEDERAL INSURANCE COMPANY v. Public Service Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1977
  3. Montgomery Ward & Co. v. KernsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1970
  4. White v. BrockColorado Court of Appeals · 1978
  5. Wheeler v. Carl Rabe, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1979

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Bernhard v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1996
  2. People v. LeeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1986
  3. Larsen v. Consolidated Pet Foods, Inc. (In Re S & D Foods, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Colorado · 1992
  4. People v. LanariColorado Court of Appeals · 1991
  5. People v. KurzColorado Court of Appeals · 1992

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API