Legal Opinion

People v. Lee

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided April 21, 1986No. 84SA355PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VOLLACK, Justice.

Defendants were charged with violating the commercial bribery statute, § 18-5-401, 8 C.R.S. (1978). Defendant Lee moved to dismiss the charge on the ground that the statute is unconstitutional on its face. The trial court granted Lee’s motion to dismiss, finding that the statute is unconstitutional. Defendant Carlisle then joined in Lee’s motion to dismiss, and the trial court granted the motion. We reverse and remand for further proceedings.

I

Section 18-5-401, 8 C.R.S. (1978) reads:

Commercial bribery and breach of duty to act disinterestedly. (1) A person commits a class 5…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. United States v. RainesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  2. People v. BlueSupreme Court of Colorado · 1975
  3. Armstrong v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1985
  4. People v. MasonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1982
  5. Widener v. DISTRICT COURT OF CTY. OF JEFFERSONSupreme Court of Colorado · 1980

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. People v. PahlColorado Court of Appeals · 2006
  2. United States v. Carrie Renee Gaudreau and Conrad Paul Gaudreau, AKA Joseph GaudreauCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1989
  3. People ex rel. J.C.S.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2007
  4. United States v. Lewis M. Dischner, United States of America v. Carl W. MathisenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
  5. United States v. LeeDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1987

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API