Legal Opinion

People ex rel. Kraemer v. Bagshaw

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 27, 1942No. Civ. No. 12060PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWard, J.

This appeal by defendant presents legal questions similar to those of People ex rel. Bagshaw v. Thompson, ante, p. 147 [130 P.2d 237], and People ex rel. Bagshaw v. Bagshaw, post, p. 940 [130 P.2d 242], but based upon a different factual background. The issue herein may be stated as follows: “Are the duties of City Councilman of a municipal corporation of the sixth class, without charter, incompatible with the duties of County Supervisor of the County within which the municipality is located” when imposed on one and the same person?

The trial court found the duties of such offices to be in*156compa…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Chapman v. RapseyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  2. People Ex Rel. Bagshaw v. ThompsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
  3. People ex rel. Bagshaw v. BagshawCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. County of Clark v. City of Las VegasNevada Supreme Court · 1976
  2. McDonough v. RoachSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1961
  3. Opinion No. (2000), California Attorney General Reports2000
  4. Opinion No. (2009), California Attorney General Reports2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API