Fenstemacher v. Pennsylvania R.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
In Equitjh Suit by G. H. Fenstemacher against the Pennsylvania Railroad Company and others. On motion to dismiss.
1Opinion of the Court
DICKINSON, District Judge.
This motion is a challenge of the existence of a cause of action (1) in the plaintiff and (2) against the defendant, and incidentally, or at least in addition, urges (3) that the act of Congress cited as the Transportation Act (Comp. St. Ann. Supp. 1923, § 10071% et seq.), providing for what is known as the Labor Board, is unconstitutional; (4) that the order of the board in question *211was made without authority; (5) that neither the board nor'the courts have any jurisdiction of the subject-matter of the dispute set forth in the bill; and (6) that the courts are…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- United Mine Workers v. Coronado Coal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Pennsylvania R. v. United States Railroad Labor BoardDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1921
- United States R. R. Labor Board v. Pennsylvania R. R.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1922
3Cited by1 opinion
- Pennsylvania R. R. System & Allied Lines Federation No. 90 v. Pennsylvania R.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1924