Legal Opinion

Fenstemacher v. Pennsylvania R.

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided March 15, 1922No. 2531PublishedCited by 1 opinion

In Equitjh Suit by G. H. Fenstemacher against the Pennsylvania Railroad Company and others. On motion to dismiss.

1Opinion of the Court

DICKINSON, District Judge.

This motion is a challenge of the existence of a cause of action (1) in the plaintiff and (2) against the defendant, and incidentally, or at least in addition, urges (3) that the act of Congress cited as the Transportation Act (Comp. St. Ann. Supp. 1923, § 10071% et seq.), providing for what is known as the Labor Board, is unconstitutional; (4) that the order of the board in question *211was made without authority; (5) that neither the board nor'the courts have any jurisdiction of the subject-matter of the dispute set forth in the bill; and (6) that the courts are…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United Mine Workers v. Coronado Coal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
  2. Pennsylvania R. v. United States Railroad Labor BoardDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1921
  3. United States R. R. Labor Board v. Pennsylvania R. R.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1922

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Pennsylvania R. R. System & Allied Lines Federation No. 90 v. Pennsylvania R.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API