Legal Opinion

Jones v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation

District Court, N.D. California

Decided September 27, 2024No. 3:15-cv-02726Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 AMANDA JONES, Case No. 15-cv-02726-TSH 8 Plaintiff, ORDER RE PLAINTIFF’S MOTION 9 v. FOR SANCTIONS AND COURT’S ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE 10 NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION, et al., Re: Dkt. 456, 467 11 Defendants. 12 13 I. INTRODUCTION 14 Plaintiff Amanda Jones moves for sanctions in the amount of $75,594.67 against 15 Defendant Santa Cruz Metropolitan Transit District (“SCMTD”) and/or its counsel. ECF Nos. 16 456, 464, 465. SCMTD filed an Opposition (ECF No. 469) and Plaintiff filed a Reply (ECF No. 17 472). In…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Roadway Express, Inc. v. PiperSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. United States v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
  4. Gustafson v. Alloyd Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1995
  5. Julie Chalmers v. City of Los Angeles, a Municipal CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API