Legal Opinion

United States v. Parcel of Land with Building, Appurtenances & Improvements

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided March 12, 1991No. 90-1752PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOWNES, Senior Circuit Judge.

There are two basic issues in this forfeiture appeal: (1) whether we have jurisdiction to decide the appeal brought by defendant/claimant/appellant Woburn City Athletic Club, Inc.; and if we do, (2) whether the district court abused its discretion in denying claimant’s motion for relief from judgment brought under Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b)(6).

I. PROCEDURAL HISTORY

In order to understand the issues, it is necessary to state in some detail the procedural history of the case. Acting pursuant *2to 21 U.S.C. § 881(a)(7),1 the government filed a forfeiture complaint on June 30,…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Link v. Wabash RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Liljeberg v. Health Services Acquisition Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. Klapprott v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  4. Norton Ex Rel. Chiles v. MathewsSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Smith v. AyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1880

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. United States v. Parcel Of Land With Building, AppellantCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991
  2. (PC) Davis v. PhuiDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2022
  3. Aedin Quinn v. King CountyDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2026
  4. Angela Sager v. Sprouts Farmer’s Market, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 2026
  5. Baldi v. BournDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2002

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API