Legal Opinion
Norton Ex Rel. Chiles v. Mathews
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided June 29, 1976No. 74-6212PublishedCited by 292 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Blackmun
On the merits, this case raises the same question as to the constitutionality of §§ 202 (d)(3) and 216 (h)(3) (C)(ii) of the Social Security Act, 64 Stat. 484, as amended, and 79 Stat. 410, 42 U. S. C. §§ 402 (d) (3) and 416 (h) (3) (C) (ii), as was presented in Mathews v. Lucas, ante, p. 495. The present litigation, however, also raises certain jurisdictional issues. It now has become apparent that the simultaneous submission of Lucas to the Court, and our decision in that case today, make it unnecessary for us specifically to decide the jurisdictional questions.
I
Appellant Gregory Norton,…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Hagans v. LavineSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Weinberger v. SalfiSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Flemming v. NestorSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Hicks v. MirandaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Samuel Bailey v. Joe T. PattersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by292 opinions
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Califano v. YamasakiSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Heckler v. RingerSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Southeastern Community College v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Getty Oil Corporation, Succeeded by and a Division of Texaco, Inc. v. Insurance Company of North AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1988
287 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.