Legal Opinion

Lipscomb v. Paul

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided October 22, 1964No. 1 Div. 91PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COLEMAN, Justice.

Defendants appeal from a judgment for plaintiff in an action under the Employer’s Liability Act, Title 26, § 326 et seq.

The complaint contained three counts, all apparently intended to state a cause of action under the first subdivision of § 326. The court overruled defendants’ demurrer to the amended complaint and defendants assign this action as error, severally as to each count.

In Count 1, plaintiff claims damages for that he was in the employment of defendants as a laborer on a farm operated by defendants, and, while so employed, “ . . . by reason of a defect in the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Tennessee Coal, Iron & R. R. v. SmithSupreme Court of Alabama · 1911
  2. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. JonesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1900
  3. Whatley v. Zenida Coal Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1898
  4. Shelby Iron Co. v. BeanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1918
  5. Woodward Iron Co. v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1907

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Mathis v. Harrell Company, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2002
  2. Sikes v. JonesCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API