Mathis v. Harrell Company, Inc.
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
MADDOX, Retired Justice.
The sole issue in this case is whether the trial judge erred in entering a summary judgment in favor of the defendants in an action in which Kenneth Mathis claimed that he was injured by a defectively designed piece of farm machinery. We reverse and remand.
This action involves a piece of farm machinery called a Super Packer Cotton Module Builder (“Super Packer”) used to pack cotton into a module or bundle. The plaintiffs Kenneth Mathis and Betty G. Mathis, husband and wife, filed a five-count complaint against Harrell Company, Inc. (“Harrell Company”), the manufacturer…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- West v. Founders Life Assur. Co. of FloridaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
- Bass v. SOUTHTRUST BANK OF BALDWIN CTY.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1989
- Hanners v. Balfour Guthrie, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1990
- Bussey v. John Deere Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1988
- Casrell v. Altec Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1976
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Abney v. Crosman Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2005
- Bagley v. Bayer Corp.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2012
- Chunn v. State Ex Rel. Mississippi Department of InsuranceMississippi Supreme Court · 2015