Legal Opinion

Mathis v. Harrell Company, Inc.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided March 1, 2002No. 1001816PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MADDOX, Retired Justice.

The sole issue in this case is whether the trial judge erred in entering a summary judgment in favor of the defendants in an action in which Kenneth Mathis claimed that he was injured by a defectively designed piece of farm machinery. We reverse and remand.

This action involves a piece of farm machinery called a Super Packer Cotton Module Builder (“Super Packer”) used to pack cotton into a module or bundle. The plaintiffs Kenneth Mathis and Betty G. Mathis, husband and wife, filed a five-count complaint against Harrell Company, Inc. (“Harrell Company”), the manufacturer…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. West v. Founders Life Assur. Co. of FloridaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  2. Bass v. SOUTHTRUST BANK OF BALDWIN CTY.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  3. Hanners v. Balfour Guthrie, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1990
  4. Bussey v. John Deere Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1988
  5. Casrell v. Altec Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1976

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Abney v. Crosman Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2005
  2. Bagley v. Bayer Corp.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2012
  3. Chunn v. State Ex Rel. Mississippi Department of InsuranceMississippi Supreme Court · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API