Legal Opinion

Dikeman v. Jewel Gold Mining Co.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided June 14, 1926No. 4829PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RUDKIN, Circuit Judge.

This case was before this court on writ of error in Dikeman v. Jewel Gold Mining Co., 2 F.(2d) 665, where a full statement of the facts may be found. After the writ of error was there dismissed for want of jurisdiction, the plaintiffs in the court below petitioned that court for an order directing a resale of the property of the Jewel Gold Mining Company, the lessor, to satisfy the balance due on the personal decrees against the lessee. The present appeal is from an order denying that petition. As will appear from the statement referred to personal decrees were entered…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Flanders v. AumackOregon Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Williams v. WilsonOregon Supreme Court · 1902
  3. Dikeman v. Jewel Gold Mining Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1924

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. (PC) Warden v. CowanDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2025
  2. Bank of America, N.A. v. BlasDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 2025
  3. Vien-Phuong Ho v. Recontrust Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
  4. Vien-Phuong Thi Ho v. ReconTrust Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
  5. Vien-Phuong Thi Ho v. Recontrust Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API