Legal Opinion

Vien-Phuong Ho v. Recontrust Co.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 22, 2017No. 10-56884Published

1Opinion of the Court

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT VIEN-PHUONG THI HO, No. 10-56884 Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. v. 2:10-cv-00741-GW-SS RECONTRUST COMPANY, NA, subsidiaries of Bank of AMENDED OPINION America, N.A.; COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOANS INC; BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., Defendants-Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California George H. Wu, District Judge, Presiding Argued and Submitted June 5, 2015 Submission Vacated June 8, 2015 Resubmitted September 3, 2015 Pasadena, California Filed October 19, 2016 Amended May 22, 2017 2 HO V.…

2Cases cited43 opinions

  1. Michael Lacey v. Joseph ArpaioCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
  2. Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  3. United States v. Mead Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
  4. Rice v. Santa Fe Elevator Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
  5. BFP v. Resolution Trust CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1994

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API