Legal Opinion
In Re Veach
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided January 29, 1925No. 269, OriginalPublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Per curiam
Veach alleges in his petition filed here that Adler instituted his suit-in said District Court in April, 1919; that a receiver was appointed in said cause of all the properties of the Railways Company, with power to take possession of and oper ate its street ear system in the city of St. Louis; that said receiver took possession and has continued in possession of said properties and has eontinuonsly operated them. Adler’s complaint, on whieh the receiver was appointed, and Veaeh’s petition in intervention, which he tendered to the clerk, and whieh the clerk refused to file, are attached as…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Adler v. SeamanCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1920
- Charleston & Western Carolina Railway Co. v. Pope & FlemingSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
- King v. BarrCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1920
- Seaboard Air-Line Railway v. Knickerbocker Trust Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1906
- Mueller v. AdlerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1923
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- State of Washington v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1936
- Whittaker v. Brictson Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1930
- Miller v. Pyrites Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1934
- Board of Drainage Com'rs of Pender County Drainage Dist. No. 4 v. Lafayette Southside Bank of St. LouisCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1928
- Wenborne-Karpen Dryer Co. v. Dort Motor Car Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1926
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.