Legal Opinion · Dissent

Pinkney v. State

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided June 15, 1998No. 88, Sept. Term, 1997Published

1DissentCathell, Judge

I respectfully dissent. The thousands of instances in which defendants fail to appear for trial in the State of Maryland, which I will note later, seriously disrupt the calendars of the courts and inconvenience a multitude of jurors and witnesses. There are potentially tens of thousands of witnesses, including police officers and jurors, persons fulfilling their civic duties, whose lives and occupations and the services they perform for the public, are disrupted needlessly and seriously by the conduct of defendants who willfully fail to appear.

Although this case concerns the single witness…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Diaz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  2. Crosby v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Lampkins v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1997
  4. In Re Formal Inquiry Concerning Judge DienerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1973
  5. United States v. Edwin HoutchensCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API