Legal Opinion

McClure Telephone Co. v. AT & T Communications of Ohio, Inc.

District Court, N.D. Ohio

Decided May 27, 2009No. Case 3:08CV2800PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

JAMES G. CARR, Chief Judge.

This is a case in which plaintiff, McClure Telephone Company [McClure], originally filed a state law collection claim against defendants AT & T Communications of Ohio [AT & T Ohio] and Sprint Communications Company L.P., [Sprint] in the Court of Common Pleas for Henry County, Ohio. Plaintiff seeks damages for AT & T Ohio’s and Sprint’s failure to pay it intrastate access charges under the state tariff it filed with the Ohio Public Utilities Commission [PUCO]. Asserting that plaintiffs claim arises under federal law, AT & T Ohio and Sprint removed the case to…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Caterpillar Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. Grable & Sons Metal Products, Inc. v. Darue Engineering & ManufacturingSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  3. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. MottleySupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  4. Empire Healthchoice Assurance, Inc. v. McVeighSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  5. Holmes Group, Inc. v. Vornado Air Circulation Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Terry Henderson, et al. v. Lindsey Leopold, et al.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API