Legal Opinion

Keogh Corp. v. Howard, Weil, Labouisse, Friedrichs Inc.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided August 10, 1993No. 88 Civ. 8447 (MGC)PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

CEDARBAUM, District Judge.

The Keogh Corporation (“Keogh”) sues defendants Howard, Weil, Labouisse, Friedrichs Incorporated, (“Howard Weil”), Howard Weil Financial Corporation (“Howard Weil Financial”) and Alan Arnold for violations of RICO. The complaint alleges that defendants took over Keogh’s business through RICO violations based on predicate acts of extortion and bribery. The complaint also alleges various pendent state law claims. Defendants move for summary judgment dismissing the action on a number of grounds. In open court, I granted defendants’ motion for…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Levine v. SmithSupreme Court of Delaware · 1991
  2. Italo-Petroleum Corporation of America v. HanniganSupreme Court of Delaware · 1940
  3. Phoenix Finance Corp. v. Iowa-Wisconsin Bridge Co.Superior Court of Delaware · 1940
  4. Chew v. Inverness Mgt. CorporationCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1976

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Woods v. Wells Fargo Bank WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API