Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

E.G. v. C.C.D.

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided May 6, 2010No. 20090101-CAPublished

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partThorne, Judge

126 I concur with the majority opinion's conclusion that C.C.D. (Father) strictly complied with Utah Code section 78B-6-121(8)(b)() by setting forth in his affidavit "his plans for care of the child." See Utah Code Ann. § 78B-6-121(8)(b)() (Supp.2009). However, I cannot agree with the majority opinion that Father's affidavit constituted a failure to agree "to a court order of child support and the payment of expenses incurred in connection with the mother's pregnancy and the child's birth." See id. § 78B-6-121(8)(b)(ii). Nor do I agree with the district court that Father's failure to actually…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Adarand Constructors, Inc. v. PenaSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  2. United States v. Playboy Entertainment Group, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Wells v. Children's Aid Soc. of UtahUtah Supreme Court · 1984
  4. In Re Adoption of Baby Boy DoeUtah Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Thurnwald v. A.E.Utah Supreme Court · 2007

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API