Legal Opinion

In Re Adoption of Baby Boy Doe

Utah Supreme Court

Decided March 5, 1986No. 20392PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DURHAM, Justice:

Appellant challenges the decision of the lower court which terminated his parental rights to Baby Boy Doe, appellant’s illegitimate son. For the reasons stated below, we reverse.

Appellant, a California resident, lived with Baby Boy Doe’s mother, S.H., for three and a half years in California. In June 1984, S.H. moved to Utah to live with her brother and sister-in-law. At that time, S.H. was pregnant with appellant’s child. While she was in Utah, S.H.’s relatives tried to discourage any contact between S.H. and appellant. Appellant, however, continued to speak to S.H. on the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Wells v. Children's Aid Soc. of UtahUtah Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Sanchez v. L.D.S. Social ServicesUtah Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Ellis v. Social Services Department of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day SaintsUtah Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Walley v. Deseret National BankUtah Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Wilson v. PierceUtah Supreme Court · 1963

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Manzanares v. ByingtonUtah Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Appeal of H.R.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
  3. Ruben Pena v. Edward Mattox, Charles Bretz, Patricia Schneider, and Others UnknownCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
  4. R.C.S. v. A.O.L.Utah Supreme Court · 2012
  5. In Re the Termination of Parental Rights Over Boy K.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1996

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API