Legal Opinion

People v. Cox

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 11, 1969No. Crim. 14610PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHerndon, J.

Defendants Carol Cox and Clarice Lundgren appeal from the judgments (Pen. Code, § 1237, subd. 1) entered following a jury trial which resulted in their conviction of the crime of burglary. Inasmuch as the evidence demonstrative of appellants’ guilt is so conclusive as to render insufficient the usual descriptive adjective “overwhelming,” appellants necessarily challenge only the propriety of the conduct of those who harvested the evidence and the manner of its presentation to the trier of fact.

Appellants were seen to steal certain items from the Broadway Department Store in Downey, California…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Barber v. PageSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. People v. WebbCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  3. People v. HarrisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
  4. People v. GibbsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
  5. People v. GreenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Caughlin v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  2. People v. MastersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
  3. People v. TorresCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
  4. Curry v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  5. Preyer v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1979

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API