Legal Opinion

People v. Gibbs

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 7, 1967No. Crim. 4300PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFriedman, J.

Defendant Gibbs appeals after a jury found him guilty of selling marijuana. He charges-' that prejudicial error occurred when the prosecution was permitted to place in evidence the transcribed testimony of a witness named Smith, who had testified at defendant’s preliminary examination.

Smith was acting as a police informer. A state narcotics agent had driven him to the residences of two suspected marijuana dealers to make “buys.”' Smith entered the home of one Cole, who gave him a marijuana, cigarette. Later' he was let off near, the residence of defendant Gibbs'. .'Smith entered, then…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Pointer v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. Douglas v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  4. Rideout v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  5. People v. McShannCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. People v. MayfieldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
  2. People v. MaxwellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
  3. Hamburg v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1991
  4. People v. BrockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  5. People v. OrozcoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API