People v. Gibbs
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtFriedman, J.
Defendant Gibbs appeals after a jury found him guilty of selling marijuana. He charges-' that prejudicial error occurred when the prosecution was permitted to place in evidence the transcribed testimony of a witness named Smith, who had testified at defendant’s preliminary examination.
Smith was acting as a police informer. A state narcotics agent had driven him to the residences of two suspected marijuana dealers to make “buys.”' Smith entered the home of one Cole, who gave him a marijuana, cigarette. Later' he was let off near, the residence of defendant Gibbs'. .'Smith entered, then…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Pointer v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Douglas v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Rideout v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
- People v. McShannCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- People v. MayfieldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
- People v. MaxwellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
- Hamburg v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1991
- People v. BrockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- People v. OrozcoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.