Legal Opinion
Mill Street Realty, Inc. v. Reineke
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided March 5, 1990PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
In an action pursuant to General Obligations Law § 5-511, inter alia, to declare certain deeds issued by the plaintiffs to the defendants void as part of a usurious loan transaction, the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (Benson, J.), entered April 25, 1988, which granted the defendants’ motion pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (5) to dismiss the complaint as time barred.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
The Supreme Court properly granted the defendants’ motion to dismiss the complaint on the ground that the action was barred by the Statute of…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Rovello v. Orofino Realty Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1976
- Palen v. . JohnsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
- Robinson v. MillerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1924
- Gilleran v. ColbyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1914
- Shute v. StattmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1938
3Cited by5 opinions
- Glassman v. ZorefAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- P.A.C.W.S., Ltd. v. ReinekeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- Monterosso v. GarguiloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2020
- Ah Wines, Inc. v. C6 Capital Funding LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2022
- Welz v. BrownAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2024