Legal Opinion

Shute v. Stattman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 27, 1938PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In an action to foreclose a mortgage, in which defendants Stattman pleaded usury, judgment modified by eliminating the provision therein which permits defendant Herman Stattman to recover from the plaintiff $247.50, with interest from April 1, 1934, and as so modified the judgment is unanimously affirmed, without costs. This sum represents interest in excess of the legal rate which defendants Stattman paid by reason of an independent usurious agreement that had no relation to the original transaction. There is

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Mill Street Realty, Inc. v. ReinekeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  2. Garcia v. Valdes (In re Garcia)District Court, E.D. New York · 1994
  3. In re the Accounting of Lincoln Rochester Trust Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1952