Legal Opinion

State v. Youngblood

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided October 2, 1986No. 2 CA-CR 3979, 2 CA-CR 4364-2PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LACAGNINA, Judge.

■ Larry Youngblood appeals his jury convictions for molestation of a child, sexual assault and kidnapping, with a prior conviction, and the court’s imposition of presumptive concurrent 10.5-year prison terms. His defenses to the charges were misidentification and nonpresence. Youngblood argues that the convictions should be reversed and the case against him dismissed because the state failed to adequately preserve certain physical evidence and disposed of other evidence in violation of his due process rights. We agree with Young-blood’s arguments and reverse.

THE…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. United States v. AgursSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. California v. TrombettaSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. People v. NationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
  5. State v. PerezArizona Supreme Court · 1984

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Arizona v. YoungbloodSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. People v. SutherlandIllinois Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Ex Parte AmezquitaCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2006
  4. State v. BeatyArizona Supreme Court · 1988
  5. State v. FainIdaho Supreme Court · 1989

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API