Legal Opinion

Lucasarts Entertainment Co. v. Humongous Entertainment Co.

District Court, N.D. California

Decided September 1, 1993No. C-92-4410-VRW [ENE]PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER.

WALKER, District Judge.

This suit arises as a result of an agreement between Electronic Arts, Inc. (“Electronic Arts”) and defendant Humongous Entertainment Company (“Humongous”), granting Electronic Arts the right to distribute Humongous’ products, including a computer video game entitled Putt Putt Joins the Parade. Humongous’ principals are former employees of plaintiff LueasArts Entertainment Company (“LueasArts”), who created a software tool called the Script Creation Utility for Maniac Mansion (“SCUMM”) System. The SCUMM System is a tool used in the development of computer video…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. United States v. Socony-Vacuum Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  3. United States v. Hiram WebbCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
  4. Arizona v. Maricopa County Medical SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Northwest Wholesale Stationers, Inc. v. Pacific Stationery & Printing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re Independent Service Organizations Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1995
  2. Fields v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.District Court, D. Kansas · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API