Legal Opinion

Associated Partnership I, Inc. v. Huddleston

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided October 17, 1994PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ANDERSON, Justice.

In this direct tax appeal, the Chancellor held that the capital gain realized from the sale of a partnership interest by the taxpayer was classified as “business earnings.”1 Because we conclude that the capital gain did not arise from a transaction in the regular course of the taxpayer’s business, we hold the gain was “nonbusiness earnings.” We, therefore, reverse the Chancellor’s judgment, which denied a full refund of corporate excise taxes.

We also hold that the commercial domicile of the taxpayer was not in Tennessee and that, therefore, the nonbusiness earnings…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Union Carbide Corp. v. HuddlestonTennessee Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Wheeling Steel Corp. v. FoxSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
  3. Tenn-Tex Properties v. Brownell-Electro, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Western Natural Gas Co. v. McDonaldSupreme Court of Kansas · 1968
  5. Southern Pacific Co. v. McColganCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Hoechst Celanese Corp. v. Franchise Tax BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Ex Parte Uniroyal Tire Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2000
  3. Gannett Satellite Information Network, Inc. v. STATE, DEPT. OF REV.Montana Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Vermont National Telephone Company v. Department of TaxesSupreme Court of Vermont · 2020
  5. Blue Bell Creameries, LP v. RobertsTennessee Supreme Court · 2011

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API