Legal Opinion

People v. MacArthur

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided June 5, 2000No. 2-98-1244PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Colwell

Defendant, David MacArthur, proceeding pro se after his retained counsel withdrew, was convicted by a jury of driving under the influence of alcohol (DUI) (625 ILCS 5/11 — 501(a)(2) (West 1996)) and driving with a blood- or breath-alcohol concentration (BAG) of 0.10 or more (625 ILCS 5/11 — 501(a)(1) (West 1996)). After obtaining counsel, defendant was sentenced to one year of conditional discharge. The trial court denied defendant’s motion for a new trial, and he appeals. Defendant argues that the trial court abused its discretion in allowing defendant’s counsel to withdraw without…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Griffin v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  2. Douglas v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Argersinger v. HamlinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Scott v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. People v. KaedingIllinois Supreme Court · 1983

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. People v. MinnitiAppellate Court of Illinois · 2007
  2. Wierzbicki v. GleasonAppellate Court of Illinois · 2009
  3. People v. HerringAppellate Court of Illinois · 2002
  4. People v. CampbellAppellate Court of Illinois · 2005
  5. City of Naperville v. MannAppellate Court of Illinois · 2008

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API