Legal Opinion
In Re Terrorist Attacks on September 11, 2001
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided October 3, 2006No. 03 MDL 1570(RCC)PublishedCited by 67 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM & ORDER
CASEY, District Judge.
The Defendants’ Executive Committee (“Defendants’ Committee”) makes an application for an umbrella protective order covering all materials produced during discovery in the above-captioned case. Rule 26(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure provides that upon motion a court may grant a protective order “which justice requires to protect a party or person from. annoyance, embarrassment, oppression, or undue burden or expense,” provided that the party or person requesting the protective order has demonstrated that good cause exists for its issuance.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Seattle Times Co. v. RhinehartSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. AmodeoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
- United States v. AmodeoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
- Citizens First National Bank of Princeton v. Cincinnati Insurance Company, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1999
- Virginia Gambale v. Deutsche Bank Ag, Bankers Trust CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by67 opinions
- In re Parmalat Securities LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2009
- Gucci America, Inc. v. Guess?, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2010
- Doe No. 2 v. KolkoDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2006
- Duling v. Gristede's Operating Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2010
- John Wiley & Sons, Inc. v. Book Dog Books, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2014
62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.