Legal Opinion

People v. Durham

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided October 11, 1974No. 58824PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Barrett

Defendant was charged with the offense of theft. (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1973, ch. 38, par. 16 — 1.) After a bench trial, he was found guilty and was sentenced to a term of 30 days in the House of Correction.

On appeal, defendant raises three contentions: (1) the record does not reflect that he knowingly and understandingly waived his right to trial by jury; (2) statements made by him during the course of a custodial interrogation were improperly admitted into evidence; and (3) certain hearsay testimony was prejudicial.

I

Defendant’s case was called for trial along with the cases of a Mr. Long and a…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. People v. PrimIllinois Supreme Court · 1972
  4. The People v. SailorIllinois Supreme Court · 1969
  5. The People v. BurageIllinois Supreme Court · 1961

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People v. TidwellAppellate Court of Illinois · 1975
  2. People v. TurnerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1982
  3. People v. GreenAppellate Court of Illinois · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API