People v. Durham
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Barrett
Defendant was charged with the offense of theft. (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1973, ch. 38, par. 16 — 1.) After a bench trial, he was found guilty and was sentenced to a term of 30 days in the House of Correction.
On appeal, defendant raises three contentions: (1) the record does not reflect that he knowingly and understandingly waived his right to trial by jury; (2) statements made by him during the course of a custodial interrogation were improperly admitted into evidence; and (3) certain hearsay testimony was prejudicial.
I
Defendant’s case was called for trial along with the cases of a Mr. Long and a…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- People v. PrimIllinois Supreme Court · 1972
- The People v. SailorIllinois Supreme Court · 1969
- The People v. BurageIllinois Supreme Court · 1961
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- People v. TidwellAppellate Court of Illinois · 1975
- People v. TurnerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1982
- People v. GreenAppellate Court of Illinois · 1975