Legal Opinion
LANFERMAN
Board of Immigration Appeals
Decided July 1, 2012No. ID 3744PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Cite as
25 I&N Dec. 721
(BIA 2012) Interim Decision #3744 Matter of Roderick B. LANFERMAN, Respondent Decided March 9, 2012 U.S. Department of Justice Executive Office for Immigration Review Board of Immigration Appeals A criminal statute is divisible, regardless of its structure, if, based on the elements of the offense, some but not all violations of the statute give rise to grounds for removal or ineligibility for relief. FOR RESPONDENT: Adam Paskoff, Esquire, New York, New York FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY: Steven J. Connelly, Assistant Chief Counsel BEFORE: Board Panel: COLE,…
2Cases cited52 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Taylor v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Padilla v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- Shepard v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Carlos Rendon v. Eric Holder, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Ramiro Enrique Rojas v. Attorney General United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2013
- Flores v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2015
- CHAIREZBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2014
- Donald Franco-Casasola v. Eric Holder, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2014
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.