Legal Opinion
Shass v. Abgold Realty Corp.
New York Supreme Court
Decided December 15, 1950PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSteinbrink, J.
Separate motions are made by two of the three defendants joined in this personal injury action, to wit, the Brooklyn Union Gas Company (hereinafter referred to as the Gas Company), and one William Witkowsky to dismiss cross claims for indemnity made against them by the third defendant Abgold Realty Corporation (hereinafter referred to as Abgold), pursuant to section 264 of the Civil Practice Act. Such cross claims are now presented in Abgold’s amended answer, its first cross claims so made having been dismissed upon appeal as factually insufficient, but with leave given to plead over. (Shass…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Altz v. . LeibersonNew York Court of Appeals · 1922
- Tipaldi v. Riverside Memorial Chapel, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1948
- Tipaldi v. Riverside Memorial Chapel, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1948
- Fish v. Estate of Elizabeth M. McCarthy, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1928
- Fish v. Estate of Elizabeth M. McCarthy, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1930
3Cited by3 opinions
- Rodriquez v. LevinNew York Supreme Court · 1962
- Ling v. New York Central RailroadNew York Supreme Court · 1956
- Brady v. Rudin Management Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1961