Legal Opinion

Rodriquez v. Levin

New York Supreme Court

Decided September 17, 1962PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLouis B. Heller, J.

Defendant moves pursuant to rule 113 of the Rules of Civil Practice for summary judgment dismissing the complaint upon the ground that the action is barred by the three-year Statute of Limitations applicable to actions in negligence (Civ. Prac. Act, § 49, subd. 6).

This action is brought to recover for personal injuries alleged to have been sustained on October 25,1955 by plaintiff Natividad Rodriquez (hereinafter called “ plaintiff ”), and for consequential loss of services suffered by plaintiff’s husband, allegedly *240resulting from explosion of a refrigerator which had been installed by…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Altz v. . LeibersonNew York Court of Appeals · 1922
  2. De Clara v. Barber Steamship Lines, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1956
  3. Fish v. Estate of Elizabeth M. McCarthy, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1928
  4. People v. RobertsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1953
  5. Shass v. Abgold Realty Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1950

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Rogers v. Dorchester AssociatesNew York Court of Appeals · 1973
  2. Susskind v. 1136 Tenants Corp.Civil Court of the City of New York · 1964
  3. Hockenhull v. Cutler Hubble, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 1972
  4. Mahlmann v. YelvertonCivil Court of the City of New York · 1980
  5. Oquendo v. Mid Mem Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API