Legal Opinion
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Francisco JIMENEZ-MARMOLEJO, Defendant-Appellant
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided December 30, 1996No. 95-10262PublishedCited by 59 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
Appellant’s request for publication is GRANTED. The Memorandum disposition filed November 15, 1996, is redesignated as an authored Opinion by Judge Norris.
OPINION
WILLIAM A. NORRIS, Circuit Judge:
On appeal from his conviction for attempting to reenter the United States after deportation in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326, Francisco Jimenez-Marmolejo collaterally attacks the constitutional adequacy of his underlying deportation hearing. < In addition, he argues that the district court incorrectly denied his motions for continuance and for a new trial, and that the district court erred in its…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- United States v. Mendoza-LopezSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- United States v. Daniel Proa-TovarCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Francisca Elena Ortega De Robles v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- United States v. Jose Manuel Leon-LeonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- Saeed FOROUGHI, Petitioner, v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, RespondentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
3Cited by59 opinions
- Oscar Rojas-Garcia v. John Ashcroft, Attorney General Immigration and Naturalization Service Robert S. Coleman, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Walters v. RenoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. Juan Mario Arrieta, Defendant-Appellant-Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Jie Lin v. John Ashcroft, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- United States v. Juan Manuel Muro-InclanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.