Legal Opinion

Ætna Life Insurance v. Stewart

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided September 27, 1934No. 23622PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStephens, J.

1. A provision in an accident policy that the policy does not cover accident, injury, or disability caused “while operating [or] driving . . an automobile for wage, compensation or profit,” has reference to the driving or operation of an automobile only where the operator receives wage, compensation, or profit for the act of operating or driving the automobile. It has no reference to a situation where a person operating the automobile receives no wage, compensation, or profit for the operation of the automobile as such, but where the wage, compensation, or profit inures from the performance…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Cato v. Ætna Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1927
  2. Cotton States Life Insurance v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1884
  3. Central Manufacturers Mutual Insurance v. GrahamCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1919
  4. Hood v. Mayor of GriffinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1901
  5. Woodring v. Commercial Casualty InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 1932

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Liberty Mutual Insurance v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1942
  2. FIREMEN'S INSURANCE CO. v. AllmondCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1962
  3. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co. v. LathanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1948
  4. North British & Mercantile Ins. v. MercerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1954
  5. Travelers Insurance v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1936

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API