Legal Opinion

Travelers Insurance v. Anderson

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided March 13, 1936No. 24724PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMacIntyre, J.

The provisions of the Code of 1933, § 38-107, as to matters to be considered by the jury in determining where the preponderance of the evidence lies in a civil case, not *2relating to a “substantial, vital, and controlling issue presented by the pleadings and evidence” (Rome Ry. &c. Co. v. King, 33 Ga. App. 383, 126 S. E. 294) in any case, but relating only to a matter merely incidental and collateral to the main issues (Smith v. Page, 72 Ga. 539), are not such as that a failure of the court to charge concerning it, in the absence of a timely written request, will require the grant of a new…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Cato v. Ætna Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1927
  2. Prudential Insurance Co. of America v. SouthSupreme Court of Georgia · 1934
  3. Askew v. AmosSupreme Court of Georgia · 1918
  4. Smith v. PageSupreme Court of Georgia · 1884
  5. New York Life Insurance v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1932

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State Highway Board v. BridgesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1939
  2. Tanner-Brice Co. v. BarrsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1937
  3. Payne v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1946
  4. Williams v. Southern Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1959
  5. CENTRAL OF GEORGIA RAILROAD COMPANY v. WootenCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1982

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API