Legal Opinion
Davidson v. Brady
District Court, W.D. Michigan
Decided March 16, 1983No. G81-239PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ENSLEN, District Judge.
Plaintiff, Richard A. Davidson, brought this action seeking damages for the alleged improper disclosures of federal tax return information by the Defendants, pursuant to Section 7217 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954, 26 U.S.C. § 7217. Section 7217 authorizes suits to be brought against “a person” who discloses tax “returns” or “return information” in a manner which violates Section 6103 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954, 26 U.S.C. § 6103. The Defendants are two former United States Attorneys for this District and two unnamed employees of the Internal…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Imbler v. PachtmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- California Motor Transport Co. v. Trucking UnlimitedSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Greenwood v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Mary Ann Tavery v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
- United States v. Harry E. ClaiborneCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- First Western Government Securities, Inc. v. United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1986
- Richard A. Davidson v. James S. Brady, Robert C. Greene, John Doe I, John Doe Ii, Jointly and SeverallyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1984
- Sanders v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1984
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.