Legal Opinion
Dynaquest Corp. v. United States Postal Service
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided January 18, 1994No. 92-5165PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge SENTELLE.
Dissenting opinion filed by Circuit Judge WILLIAMS.
SENTELLE, Circuit Judge:
After an administrative hearing the Postal Service found that DynaQuest Corporation had engaged in a scheme to obtain money or property through the mails by means of false representations, in violation of the Postal Reorganization Act of 1970, 39 U.S.C. § 3005 (1988). The Service issued orders that enjoined further fraudulent mailings and prevented DynaQuest from receiving mail related to the scheme. DynaQuest brought suit in the district court to nullify the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Donaldson v. Read Magazine, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Bernard L. Silver, Cartwright-Mitchell, Inc., a Delaware Corporation v. United States Postal ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- Cities of Campbell and Thayer, Missouri v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Arkansas Power & Light Company, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1985
- Farley v. HeiningerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1939
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Colbert, Venita v. Potter, John E.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2006
- Alpart v. General Land Partners, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2008
- Consarc Corporation v. Iraqi Ministry United States Department of the Treasury, Office of Foreign Assets ControlCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1994
- United States v. Ruby ParkerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2013
- Dynaquest Corp. v. United States Postal ServiceCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2001
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.