Legal Opinion

United States v. Jordan

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided April 18, 2017No. 16-3084PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LUCERO, Circuit Judge.

Under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2), a district court may reduce a defendant’s term of imprisonment if it was “based on a sentencing range that has subsequently been lowered by the Sentencing Commission.” This appeal requires us to address the “based on” requirement of § 3582(c)(2) in the context of a Fed. R. Crim. P. 11(c)(1)(C) plea agreement.

Defendant Gregory Jordan was sentenced to 168 months’ imprisonment pursuant to a Rule 11(c)(1)(C) agreement that proposed a base offense level of 31 and a Guidelines range of 135 to 168 months. The district court accepted the plea…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Freeman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  2. In Re David L. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
  3. United States v. Ricardo EppsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2013
  4. United States v. AustinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
  5. United States v. GrahamCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2013

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. AntwineCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2017
  2. United States v. FoyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API