Legal Opinion
Thomka v. Financial Corp.
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 10, 1993No. B061692PublishedCited by 5 opinions
[Opinion certified for partial publication.*]
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
STANIFORTH, J. *
This is a consolidated appeal in two separate cases joined for trial.
Case I
Albert E. Thomka filed a multicount civil action against defendants/ appellants New West Federal Savings and Loan Association. Thomka named eight individual corporate officer employees as defendants.
At close of plaintiffs evidentiary case the trial court nonsuited all but one of Ihomka’s causes of action against New West and nonsuited all of Thomka’s claims against the individual defendants. The only cause of action remaining was for breach of employment contract against New West. After defense…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- D'Oench, Duhme & Co. v. Federal Deposit InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Foley v. Interactive Data Corp.California Supreme Court · 1988
- Langley v. Federal Deposit InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Harold v. Beighley v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1989
- Pugh v. See's Candies, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1981
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Guz v. Bechtel National, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2000
- Gould v. Maryland Sound Industries, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1995
- Hussey-Head v. World Savings & Loan Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
- Guz v. Bechtel National, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2000
- Pena v. Downey Savings & Loan, Ass'nDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1996